LIVINGSTON -- The gigantic chicken coop at the JS West farm near here is big enough to be a hangar for a Boeing 747, and the clucks from 150,000 egg-laying hens make it almost as noisy as the plane.
Jill Benson, whose family owns the place, is proud of the roomy cages, the clean, ventilated air and, yes, the never-ending squawks from all those birds.
"They're singing because they're happy," she said.
If true, California voters can take some of the credit. Proposition 2, passed by a wide margin in 2008, requires chicken farmers to give their egg-laying birds enough room to stand and spread their wings.
Farmers have until 2015 to implement the changes, and JS West is one of the few to have installed new cages already in an attempt to comply with the law. The Modesto company, which helped bankroll the campaign against Proposition 2, says it has spent more than $7 million for two barns filled with the 4-foot-by-12-foot cages, each holding 60 birds.
As is true of most egg ranches, JS West initially opposed the measure.
"That was our livelihood that was being threatened, and we fought it to the end," Benson said. "When we lost, we saw that California voters were asking for something different. We listened to what that vote said and tried to find a solution."
That solution may be going national. In a rare alliance, the Humane Society of the United States and egg ranchers have joined forces to lobby for federal legislation that would set national standards for egg ranches similar to those implemented at JS West.
"No question about it: Proposition 2 was a major wake-up call to the entire U.S. egg industry," said Chad Gregory, senior vice president of United Egg Producers, which represents most of the nation's egg farmers.
He and others believe the Humane Society support is crucial, because the group was one of the primary supporters of Proposition 2.
"The Humane Society could go into a state and say, 'You either work with us legislatively or we're going to do a ballot initiative in your state,' " Gregory said.
Not everyone favors the approach. If the federal legislation is signed into law, it would create one national standard and invalidate state and local laws, such as Proposition 2. Some animal-rights groups believe California's law could be replaced by a weaker standard. The proposed federal legislation, HR 3798, does not carry the threat of jail time, as Proposition 2 does, and it would prohibit states from banning cages.
It also would give farmers as much as 18 years to phase in the changes, which some groups say is too long.
"The Humane Society is now trying to undo Proposition 2," said Bradley Miller, director of the Humane Farming Association. "They've switched sides. They've sold out. They're betraying not only California voters, but millions of hens that are locked in horrific conditions."
Urging uniform standards
The Humane Society counters that federal legislation imposing uniform standards nationwide would benefit more chickens than a state-by-state approach, especially because many states might refuse such laws.
"The federal legislation provides a pathway to give the birds a much better life," said Wayne Pacelle, the Humane Society's president and chief executive. "It's not perfect, but it is a dramatic improvement."
Among other things, the legislation would require that some farmers nearly double the amount of space they provide egg-laying hens. It's common in some states for hens to be housed in less than 70 square inches, smaller than a sheet of printer paper.
the maldives harper lee mega millions numbers the fray seahawks new uniforms 2012 tornadoes in dallas anchorman 2
No comments:
Post a Comment